Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-27 04:16:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E113279F42F1D7BEC2924FB5E559C242C53EA4F5391E4D0600851BC87C21AF5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note NOT needed. Community Notes are not for trying to promote personally held opinions and subjective interpretations of legal judgments. In this case, the ICJ judgment is obviously open to interpretation from all sides.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750989702654501224
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E113279F42F1D7BEC2924FB5E559C242C53EA4F5391E4D0600851BC87C21AF5
  • createdAtMillis - 1706328985884
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17509897026545012245E113279F42F1D7BEC2924FB5E559C242C53EA4F5391E4D0600851BC87C21AF5