Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-27 06:08:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 470CC13033B310EC5CC165F7B6362A2A6BDB5F563D8AEAE4BC201A911D695E51
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note NOT needed. Community Notes are not for trying to promote personally held opinions and subjective interpretations of legal judgments. In this case, the ICJ judgment is obviously open to interpretation from all sides.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750989702654501224
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 470CC13033B310EC5CC165F7B6362A2A6BDB5F563D8AEAE4BC201A911D695E51
  • createdAtMillis - 1706335698357
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750989702654501224470CC13033B310EC5CC165F7B6362A2A6BDB5F563D8AEAE4BC201A911D695E51