Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-27 03:41:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0EB76ED9BFA844BB83B050A55A7036CC7AACF712FFEDDAA331699A39B57A1F12
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note NOT needed. Community Notes are not for trying to promote personally held opinions and subjective interpretations of legal judgments. In this case, the ICJ judgment is obviously open to interpretation from all sides.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750989702654501224
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0EB76ED9BFA844BB83B050A55A7036CC7AACF712FFEDDAA331699A39B57A1F12
  • createdAtMillis - 1706326868454
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17509897026545012240EB76ED9BFA844BB83B050A55A7036CC7AACF712FFEDDAA331699A39B57A1F12