Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-27 00:08:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00F0326875492DFFBA00B01777A90F665E3CE99A37AABAA157C6724C623CAA94
Participant Details

Original Note:

Note NOT needed. Community Notes are not for trying to promote personally held opinions and subjective interpretations of legal judgments. In this case, the ICJ judgment is obviously open to interpretation from all sides.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750989702654501224
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00F0326875492DFFBA00B01777A90F665E3CE99A37AABAA157C6724C623CAA94
  • createdAtMillis - 1706314085655
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175098970265450122400F0326875492DFFBA00B01777A90F665E3CE99A37AABAA157C6724C623CAA94