Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-27 10:07:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C95EBD8244228DFF8C11CCEEFFA46E8F210C020D403407C162144C7C0E43FC4C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed CN is not factual amd even israeli media link does not support claim. The icj did not in anyway rule that israel has a right to continue its "war on hamas". OP's interpretation of icj's determination is more correct. Link to ruling: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750947437966205267
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C95EBD8244228DFF8C11CCEEFFA46E8F210C020D403407C162144C7C0E43FC4C
  • createdAtMillis - 1706350057549
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750947437966205267C95EBD8244228DFF8C11CCEEFFA46E8F210C020D403407C162144C7C0E43FC4C