Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 21:54:58 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DDA8A120B37D71701EB80CE28E387FB73818A109592802655F4182F75518110F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Legal scholars believe that the Dobbs decision itself threatens privacy rights https://www.americanbar.org/groups/communications_law/publications/communications_lawyer/2023-summer/unprecedented-precedent-and-original-originalism/ and Judge Thomas names those rights https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/supreme-court-case-library/dobbs-v-jackson-womens-health-organization especially to birth control

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750947260119073097
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DDA8A120B37D71701EB80CE28E387FB73818A109592802655F4182F75518110F
  • createdAtMillis - 1706306098555
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750947260119073097DDA8A120B37D71701EB80CE28E387FB73818A109592802655F4182F75518110F