Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-27 11:21:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 09BB463EBBA255FCA79FDA25A3EBACAA97429F4424EF007CDFEB7DA0F744B2F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

Legal scholars believe that the Dobbs decision itself threatens privacy rights https://www.americanbar.org/groups/communications_law/publications/communications_lawyer/2023-summer/unprecedented-precedent-and-original-originalism/ and Judge Thomas names those rights https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution/supreme-court-case-library/dobbs-v-jackson-womens-health-organization especially to birth control

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1750947260119073097
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 09BB463EBBA255FCA79FDA25A3EBACAA97429F4424EF007CDFEB7DA0F744B2F4
createdAtMillis - 1706354483471
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 175094726011907309709BB463EBBA255FCA79FDA25A3EBACAA97429F4424EF007CDFEB7DA0F744B2F4