Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-27 17:21:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 80A3A5F4487AB110F4A38D8E387F63B7F9E2FC2C8E81018E118CAE32F18AC586
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet and it's reply claim the ruling means "no genocide", the ruling actually states that a claim of infringement of rights protecting against genocide is "plausible". The ruling states genocide in Gaza is "plausible", invalidating a claim it definitely isn't happening. https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750938532795805893
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 80A3A5F4487AB110F4A38D8E387F63B7F9E2FC2C8E81018E118CAE32F18AC586
  • createdAtMillis - 1706376080316
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175093853279580589380A3A5F4487AB110F4A38D8E387F63B7F9E2FC2C8E81018E118CAE32F18AC586