Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 20:26:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 22FE7EC031FB205233781D7AE6DF47C443730020ADE21D421E88B233A006A9C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

This tweet and it's reply claim the ruling means "no genocide", the ruling actually states that a claim of infringement of rights protecting against genocide is "plausible". The ruling states genocide in Gaza is "plausible", invalidating a claim it definitely isn't happening. https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750938532795805893
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 22FE7EC031FB205233781D7AE6DF47C443730020ADE21D421E88B233A006A9C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1706300804930
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 175093853279580589322FE7EC031FB205233781D7AE6DF47C443730020ADE21D421E88B233A006A9C1