Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 16:29:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 816ACB90C294BF98A7D11B68BD6711CBD5452D6F317F47050ED4F782A4F50535
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - JTA article linked in the note clearly states: "the ruling repeatedly made clear that the court had not found evidence of genocide, only that South Africa, in bringing the case, had made a plausible case that the Palestinians deserved protective measures from genocide."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750918261682643219
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 816ACB90C294BF98A7D11B68BD6711CBD5452D6F317F47050ED4F782A4F50535
  • createdAtMillis - 1706286559098
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750918261682643219816ACB90C294BF98A7D11B68BD6711CBD5452D6F317F47050ED4F782A4F50535