Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-27 00:17:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 862D3931AC1E11DEE7B3EB661E7828D30845E4AE424D381359DFF45C7ABC919E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ICJ clearly stated in its judgment (at paras 30 & 62) that it was not making a finding that Israel was in breach of the Genocide Convention at this stage in the proceedings. Hinkle is, therefore, incorrect to state that the court had found a violation of the Convention. https://icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750915887786275240
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 862D3931AC1E11DEE7B3EB661E7828D30845E4AE424D381359DFF45C7ABC919E
  • createdAtMillis - 1706314639749
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750915887786275240862D3931AC1E11DEE7B3EB661E7828D30845E4AE424D381359DFF45C7ABC919E