Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 15:43:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 80A3A5F4487AB110F4A38D8E387F63B7F9E2FC2C8E81018E118CAE32F18AC586
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ICJ did not confirm that South Africa is right. It only found that its claim was plausible enough to grant interim measures. Instead, the merits of the case (i.e., whether Israel actually violated the Genocide Convention) will be examined at a later stage. https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-sum-01-00-en.pdf (paras. 36, 84)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750906956020121809
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 80A3A5F4487AB110F4A38D8E387F63B7F9E2FC2C8E81018E118CAE32F18AC586
  • createdAtMillis - 1706283807050
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175090695602012180980A3A5F4487AB110F4A38D8E387F63B7F9E2FC2C8E81018E118CAE32F18AC586