Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-27 00:54:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E186E0F5C1572FF23753F79E4913D8BC4E953D7C0DC4F431B4A10FA0035422CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The ICJ did not rule on the merits of the case, as stated during the audience. The ruling was an "ad interim" measure. The Court says that "Some of the acts alleged by SA may fall under the Genocide Convention", which is very different from stating they have been committed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750903748065386888
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E186E0F5C1572FF23753F79E4913D8BC4E953D7C0DC4F431B4A10FA0035422CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1706316865687
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750903748065386888E186E0F5C1572FF23753F79E4913D8BC4E953D7C0DC4F431B4A10FA0035422CB