Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 16:38:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 46B40234A69D7296CB27006342AACBAE899F0810E258C25734D62A767A0A21B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The ICJ did not rule on the merits of the case, as stated during the audience. The ruling was an "ad interim" measure. The Court says that "Some of the acts alleged by SA may fall under the Genocide Convention", which is very different from stating they have been committed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750903748065386888
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 46B40234A69D7296CB27006342AACBAE899F0810E258C25734D62A767A0A21B4
  • createdAtMillis - 1706287119978
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175090374806538688846B40234A69D7296CB27006342AACBAE899F0810E258C25734D62A767A0A21B4