Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-27 16:43:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3ECEE727B3661E6EBB4D8968DF9FFC1A2283D8A0D43B1FBD9A68B99465FC8C9D
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The ICJ did not rule on the merits of the case, as stated during the audience. The ruling was an "ad interim" measure. The Court says that "Some of the acts alleged by SA may fall under the Genocide Convention", which is very different from stating they have been committed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750903748065386888
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3ECEE727B3661E6EBB4D8968DF9FFC1A2283D8A0D43B1FBD9A68B99465FC8C9D
  • createdAtMillis - 1706373799413
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17509037480653868883ECEE727B3661E6EBB4D8968DF9FFC1A2283D8A0D43B1FBD9A68B99465FC8C9D