Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 18:12:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 10BABA53479B40875422F385C3D7C648C0229976D5572BC479238BB1A9241389
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The ICJ did not rule on the merits of the case, as stated during the audience. The ruling was an "ad interim" measure. The Court says that "Some of the acts alleged by SA may fall under the Genocide Convention", which is very different from stating they have been committed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750903748065386888
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 10BABA53479B40875422F385C3D7C648C0229976D5572BC479238BB1A9241389
  • createdAtMillis - 1706292735070
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175090374806538688810BABA53479B40875422F385C3D7C648C0229976D5572BC479238BB1A9241389