Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 17:57:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E36F18ECC65E3E37E2B40BA620115568ABBA0E5EBF129F765075E9CEDBE58C8
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The proposed CN is not relevant to Jones’ tweets. A ceasefire is not the issue being discussed by Jones and as such is one for the replies, not for a CN. Jones’ original tweet is factually accurate and uses direct quotes from the ICJ’s ruling.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750900310745207219
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E36F18ECC65E3E37E2B40BA620115568ABBA0E5EBF129F765075E9CEDBE58C8
  • createdAtMillis - 1706291862943
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17509003107452072198E36F18ECC65E3E37E2B40BA620115568ABBA0E5EBF129F765075E9CEDBE58C8