Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 14:55:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D5B114DEB3D75C70CFB6C04DE6105840620D2C5892DDE300869F8ED749EF393E
Participant Details

Original Note:

Owen attemps to put a spin on the ICJ ruling to suit his agenda. The ICJ ruled against SA on its main demand to stop military action. If the ICJ believed that a genocide was happening, as Owen implies, it had the powers to rule a stop to the war. It did not. https://twitter.com/HeidiBachram/status/1750879888263860724?t=YzL9zyCU28XSSm3qmZ_83A&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750892845194420604
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D5B114DEB3D75C70CFB6C04DE6105840620D2C5892DDE300869F8ED749EF393E
  • createdAtMillis - 1706280921278
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750892845194420604D5B114DEB3D75C70CFB6C04DE6105840620D2C5892DDE300869F8ED749EF393E