Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 15:30:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2964D7644835CF79A0DD43D5E236B97FD5E13A6ABDA2FC57AC1D2666C1946E94
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. If you disagree with the interpretation of the ruling, take it to the comments. OP is giving an opinion, and the ICJ ruled that there was enough evidence to open a case.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750888998220841468
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2964D7644835CF79A0DD43D5E236B97FD5E13A6ABDA2FC57AC1D2666C1946E94
  • createdAtMillis - 1706283013308
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17508889982208414682964D7644835CF79A0DD43D5E236B97FD5E13A6ABDA2FC57AC1D2666C1946E94