Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 22:07:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BFDD604937541F1AC934DEFC095562E8975AA8E71D5B1CB812674253EEFB2264
Participant Details

Original Note:

La orden de la CIJ es la que reseña el autor del post. La Corte indicó que no se trata de una decisión sobre el fondo de la denuncia sino sólo sobre medidas provisionales. Adicionalmente, incluye su opinión sobre la necesidad de un alto al fuego. No necesita nota de contexto. https://news.un.org/es/story/2024/01/1527332

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750884375682547941
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BFDD604937541F1AC934DEFC095562E8975AA8E71D5B1CB812674253EEFB2264
  • createdAtMillis - 1706306838812
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750884375682547941BFDD604937541F1AC934DEFC095562E8975AA8E71D5B1CB812674253EEFB2264