Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 15:34:54 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 44A058E4CAEFEADD674A03AD20224F1259859384A11A8EF4B911046D3B69152A
Participant Details

Original Note:

La orden de la CIJ es la que reseña el autor del post. La Corte indicó que no se trata de una decisión sobre el fondo de la denuncia sino sólo sobre medidas provisionales. Adicionalmente, incluye su opinión sobre la necesidad de un alto al fuego. No necesita nota de contexto. https://news.un.org/es/story/2024/01/1527332

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750884375682547941
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 44A058E4CAEFEADD674A03AD20224F1259859384A11A8EF4B911046D3B69152A
  • createdAtMillis - 1706283294008
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175088437568254794144A058E4CAEFEADD674A03AD20224F1259859384A11A8EF4B911046D3B69152A