Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 15:37:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 354892C4E64F567A94117B5E437A8322D200CAD8BBC9E06B7A6325BFF2647AF6
Participant Details

Original Note:

La orden de la CIJ es la que reseña el autor del post. La Corte indicó que no se trata de una decisión sobre el fondo de la denuncia sino sólo sobre medidas provisionales. Adicionalmente, incluye su opinión sobre la necesidad de un alto al fuego. No necesita nota de contexto. https://news.un.org/es/story/2024/01/1527332

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750884375682547941
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 354892C4E64F567A94117B5E437A8322D200CAD8BBC9E06B7A6325BFF2647AF6
  • createdAtMillis - 1706283428839
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750884375682547941354892C4E64F567A94117B5E437A8322D200CAD8BBC9E06B7A6325BFF2647AF6