Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 06:50:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 47546DA4D8A5BF0DDE675EED2E6E0D31B52ECBDE3546ADDC43C8118AD7BDD4E7
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed notes deserve to be in the reply section. The CN which apparently quotes from the textbook leads to a publisher page with no access (hence can't be used to verify the note author's claim), and the second CN clearly belongs in the comments section.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750760187261309152
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 47546DA4D8A5BF0DDE675EED2E6E0D31B52ECBDE3546ADDC43C8118AD7BDD4E7
  • createdAtMillis - 1706251819345
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175076018726130915247546DA4D8A5BF0DDE675EED2E6E0D31B52ECBDE3546ADDC43C8118AD7BDD4E7