Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 08:34:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 003B7CADC3482D712FA93ADC14C5722E6371DF45921B43AFE6936BE446DD4CC6
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed notes deserve to be in the reply section. The CN which apparently quotes from the textbook leads to a publisher page with no access (hence can't be used to verify the note author's claim), and the second CN clearly belongs in the comments section.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750760187261309152
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 003B7CADC3482D712FA93ADC14C5722E6371DF45921B43AFE6936BE446DD4CC6
  • createdAtMillis - 1706258047322
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750760187261309152003B7CADC3482D712FA93ADC14C5722E6371DF45921B43AFE6936BE446DD4CC6