Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 21:12:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EECEA37C79C61EF649FE7B317E541ECDAF9ED42E41B267996652E31D4C9FFA16
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN — for christ sake, please stop using 3 year old articles to dispute NEW findings. Science progresses forward, not backwards. If you have specific issues with the study please use replies, not CNs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750724215362179283
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EECEA37C79C61EF649FE7B317E541ECDAF9ED42E41B267996652E31D4C9FFA16
  • createdAtMillis - 1706303551702
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750724215362179283EECEA37C79C61EF649FE7B317E541ECDAF9ED42E41B267996652E31D4C9FFA16