Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 07:49:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E95E77F2B356E1469C0595A76CC6632BCC31880801AFC60706AD19BAB2C6ED11
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN — for christ sake, please stop using 3 year old articles to dispute NEW findings. Science progresses forward, not backwards. If you have specific issues with the study please use replies, not CNs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750724215362179283
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E95E77F2B356E1469C0595A76CC6632BCC31880801AFC60706AD19BAB2C6ED11
  • createdAtMillis - 1706255365608
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750724215362179283E95E77F2B356E1469C0595A76CC6632BCC31880801AFC60706AD19BAB2C6ED11