Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 06:44:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 07A080538273C5D54D7F4F056CA6511136D5FD5DD12F704439AF304EC5FFEB50
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN — for christ sake, please stop using 3 year old articles to dispute NEW findings. Science progresses forward, not backwards. If you have specific issues with the study please use replies, not CNs.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750724215362179283
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 07A080538273C5D54D7F4F056CA6511136D5FD5DD12F704439AF304EC5FFEB50
  • createdAtMillis - 1706251496353
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175072421536217928307A080538273C5D54D7F4F056CA6511136D5FD5DD12F704439AF304EC5FFEB50