Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-31 01:36:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 69CAE597976A22C6AD8171F2F48DC35D139C090EE8A670A3DEAF034FCC55D1D5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Although branded by FT, this content is not from FT, and is not signed by any journalist. FT branding may give a false impression that this article was impartially researched by a reputable journalist. https://twitter.com/ft_content

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750670684530061384
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 69CAE597976A22C6AD8171F2F48DC35D139C090EE8A670A3DEAF034FCC55D1D5
  • createdAtMillis - 1706665005948
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 175067068453006138469CAE597976A22C6AD8171F2F48DC35D139C090EE8A670A3DEAF034FCC55D1D5