Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 00:14:44 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3440986FC710FE319B8AD8884DC256FDF16FFB50423B7763189F9CE32A580E4B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The current note says that the tweet is inaccurate, but provides no reason to think so. Him appearing in other films afterwards doesn't conflict with him returning to working in a mall shop, or that he was only paid 65k.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750596100686516308
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3440986FC710FE319B8AD8884DC256FDF16FFB50423B7763189F9CE32A580E4B
  • createdAtMillis - 1706228084746
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17505961006865163083440986FC710FE319B8AD8884DC256FDF16FFB50423B7763189F9CE32A580E4B