Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 06:42:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 030776B6F2AACC0B2BA8744C5C37331B844FB87D21A4759B19348D09A246E837
Participant Details

Original Note:

The current note says that the tweet is inaccurate, but provides no reason to think so. Him appearing in other films afterwards doesn't conflict with him returning to working in a mall shop, or that he was only paid 65k.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750596100686516308
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 030776B6F2AACC0B2BA8744C5C37331B844FB87D21A4759B19348D09A246E837
  • createdAtMillis - 1706251327103
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750596100686516308030776B6F2AACC0B2BA8744C5C37331B844FB87D21A4759B19348D09A246E837