Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-25 16:02:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F74F87A5F16A9653B347040B90F42A631602544B78A35D941EE290CFE2C31BB8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il est peu probable que les produits soit remis au restos du cœur coeur, il n’y a dans le tweet aucune preuve. Si les restos du cœur recevais il s’agitait de recel (Article 321-1 Code pénal) . De plus les aliments ont l’aire d’être jeté au sol https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/article_lc/LEGIARTI000006418233/1994-07-30

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750480789853098001
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F74F87A5F16A9653B347040B90F42A631602544B78A35D941EE290CFE2C31BB8
  • createdAtMillis - 1706198526484
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750480789853098001F74F87A5F16A9653B347040B90F42A631602544B78A35D941EE290CFE2C31BB8