Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-05-07 05:12:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6C395D7FC329534ED77488864948DFAF27C717C8134AE84E6DD7CAABBF6ADAAE
Participant Details

Original Note:

In their own methods the “study” this is based upon stated, “no recent reliable state-level data on completed vaginal rapes are available, we analyzed multiple data sources to estimate reported and unreported rapes in states with total abortion bans” https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2814274

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750337154470047894
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6C395D7FC329534ED77488864948DFAF27C717C8134AE84E6DD7CAABBF6ADAAE
  • createdAtMillis - 1715058721234
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17503371544700478946C395D7FC329534ED77488864948DFAF27C717C8134AE84E6DD7CAABBF6ADAAE