Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-25 02:35:27 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BBBDA7F306B6B2C6E224C37BF70E89C5586F1137A7EC8E1CF74466A93583573B
Participant Details

Original Note:

In the 1st article's cited study 2/3 papers had not addressed any causes https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac2966 Consensus isn't a good scientific argument Second article isn't useful as it is behind a paywall and possibly biased source CO2 Coalition doesn't believe climate change is fake https://co2coalition.org/about/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750332709338026353
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BBBDA7F306B6B2C6E224C37BF70E89C5586F1137A7EC8E1CF74466A93583573B
  • createdAtMillis - 1706150127718
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750332709338026353BBBDA7F306B6B2C6E224C37BF70E89C5586F1137A7EC8E1CF74466A93583573B