Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-24 21:34:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F3E63AD5392037EE20E84BFA15AE980613420649E9E9413A25EAAA76C8CAFD98
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the proposed note sources the bbc/trustLab study which doesn’t seem to take into account community notes when counting disinformation posts. If many of those Disinformation X posts are community noted and rectified, it changes the whole result of the study https://disinfocode.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/code-of-practice-on-disinformation-september-22-2023.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750261962817073517
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F3E63AD5392037EE20E84BFA15AE980613420649E9E9413A25EAAA76C8CAFD98
  • createdAtMillis - 1706132083197
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750261962817073517F3E63AD5392037EE20E84BFA15AE980613420649E9E9413A25EAAA76C8CAFD98