Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-24 22:39:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7DB2B54516789185FEFEC60B6EF10DBF74CF56402ACB39C79EFEF220EFDCB522
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - the proposed note sources the bbc/trustLab study which doesn’t seem to take into account community notes when counting disinformation posts. If many of those Disinformation X posts are community noted and rectified, it changes the whole result of the study https://disinfocode.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/code-of-practice-on-disinformation-september-22-2023.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750261962817073517
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7DB2B54516789185FEFEC60B6EF10DBF74CF56402ACB39C79EFEF220EFDCB522
  • createdAtMillis - 1706135957832
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17502619628170735177DB2B54516789185FEFEC60B6EF10DBF74CF56402ACB39C79EFEF220EFDCB522