Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-25 12:08:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 698C81A940E8867EA558164A7DC2594321C6631CAE4CDF0095AB5EF056F459AE
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the user did admit to scaling the models, this was simply done to make the comparision possible. Even though it's nothing conclusive, it also can't be claimed to be fabrication. https://twitter.com/byofrog/status/1750179511516164346

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750215395527532916
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 698C81A940E8867EA558164A7DC2594321C6631CAE4CDF0095AB5EF056F459AE
  • createdAtMillis - 1706184515548
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1750215395527532916698C81A940E8867EA558164A7DC2594321C6631CAE4CDF0095AB5EF056F459AE