Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-24 17:36:48 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 446816DB9B0196D245E0EB66CC6F089B4109B976A8D9C827C62E3FA3ED05FE63
Participant Details

Original Note:

Este post no necesita-Nota ya que el Jucio por este caso está en proceso y este documento es una conclusion de una agencia tributaria no de jn Juez pero aun así basado en hechos, las otras notas están basadas en FANATISMOS DEPORTIVOS y no objetivos.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750200913560535251
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 446816DB9B0196D245E0EB66CC6F089B4109B976A8D9C827C62E3FA3ED05FE63
  • createdAtMillis - 1706117808066
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750200913560535251446816DB9B0196D245E0EB66CC6F089B4109B976A8D9C827C62E3FA3ED05FE63