Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-24 16:11:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 416E90C7BA7C36914B844D80AAE4D6A3A6539E9BFA9152271DD6D329E475124B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Fake news Judge Aguirre's case doesn't revolve around buying referees it revolves around corrupting the competition by aquiring refereeing benefits which happened through the payment to the HEAD of referees responsible of promoting and demoting referees and match designation https://twitter.com/ExJohnHonestyy/status/1750176403268510174?t=0PC4pHYzQ-v4T9SC_2l5ug&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1750185380077322676
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 416E90C7BA7C36914B844D80AAE4D6A3A6539E9BFA9152271DD6D329E475124B
createdAtMillis - 1706112667718
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1750185380077322676416E90C7BA7C36914B844D80AAE4D6A3A6539E9BFA9152271DD6D329E475124B