Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-24 16:20:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E0BCB2ACCF670546F1C40E96E6FC1B41BD1F589609628AC00BB69583004E1B3
Participant Details

Original Note:

Fake news Judge Aguirre's case doesn't revolve around buying referees it revolves around corrupting the competition by aquiring refereeing benefits which happened through the payment to the HEAD of referees responsible of promoting and demoting referees and match designation https://twitter.com/ExJohnHonestyy/status/1750176403268510174?t=0PC4pHYzQ-v4T9SC_2l5ug&s=19

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1750185380077322676
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0E0BCB2ACCF670546F1C40E96E6FC1B41BD1F589609628AC00BB69583004E1B3
createdAtMillis - 1706113250579
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 17501853800773226760E0BCB2ACCF670546F1C40E96E6FC1B41BD1F589609628AC00BB69583004E1B3