Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-24 11:14:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 658B5B026FB3C9A4240AAC214E605C5DA8F91FFEBAD6C102476ADDDB6F3D2538
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Federal Court ruled that the invocation of the Emergencies Act was unreasonable and a violation of Charter rights. Futhermore, the judge explicitly says he *MAY* have supported it, not that he "would have" as this post claims. https://theccf.ca/wp-content/uploads/EA-challenge-fed-court-reasons-FINAL.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750106243723669924
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 658B5B026FB3C9A4240AAC214E605C5DA8F91FFEBAD6C102476ADDDB6F3D2538
  • createdAtMillis - 1706094845224
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750106243723669924658B5B026FB3C9A4240AAC214E605C5DA8F91FFEBAD6C102476ADDDB6F3D2538