Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-24 15:36:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1E88DDB7C7065B2F4FCA4D453A3B3E28E1792E6DA915041F3DA1581181BE3FE2
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. El post inicial es una opinión ya que no es una acción clara de penalti, hay margen para la interpretación. Además, en ese corte es difícil afirmar con seguridad que Bellingham esté en fuera de juego, ya que podría estar por detrás de la pelota en el momento del pase: https://www.theifab.com/es/laws/latest/offside/#offside-position

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1750063858322944116
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 1E88DDB7C7065B2F4FCA4D453A3B3E28E1792E6DA915041F3DA1581181BE3FE2
createdAtMillis - 1706110588473
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17500638583229441161E88DDB7C7065B2F4FCA4D453A3B3E28E1792E6DA915041F3DA1581181BE3FE2