Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-24 03:28:23 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0A182617BED37C3291174EBB9214BE47499A647AADA99BB78A7054AB0D252F9
Participant Details

Original Note:

少なくとも現在では、返信方法による違いはありません。 過去に類似の噂について検証した方が複数いますが、いずれも返信方法による違いはない、という結論になっています。 https://twitter.com/keita_roboin/status/1686607997257261056 https://twitter.com/faa0311/status/1686767451575603200 https://roboin.io/article/2023/08/04/difference-between-two-twitter-reply-methods/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749982612939289061
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C0A182617BED37C3291174EBB9214BE47499A647AADA99BB78A7054AB0D252F9
  • createdAtMillis - 1706066903748
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1749982612939289061C0A182617BED37C3291174EBB9214BE47499A647AADA99BB78A7054AB0D252F9