Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-24 20:22:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0171971417BE044D5326D2EFA953E528DAE29040D007DD6B9E0B65654162BAF
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge’s exact wording was that he “may have” invoked the act. Using the word “probably” when summarizing his ruling wildly misrepresents his actual view. Also, tweets are not reliable sources

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749973868561764529
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0171971417BE044D5326D2EFA953E528DAE29040D007DD6B9E0B65654162BAF
  • createdAtMillis - 1706127765952
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1749973868561764529F0171971417BE044D5326D2EFA953E528DAE29040D007DD6B9E0B65654162BAF