Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-24 15:19:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DDDCBE0FFCAE8D9A9C6E2FBE0D60FAC97DEECF94D0E7EF2F4C43573248879930
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge’s exact wording was that he “may have” invoked the act. Using the word “probably” when summarizing his ruling wildly misrepresents his actual view. Also, tweets are not reliable sources

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749973868561764529
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DDDCBE0FFCAE8D9A9C6E2FBE0D60FAC97DEECF94D0E7EF2F4C43573248879930
  • createdAtMillis - 1706109553003
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1749973868561764529DDDCBE0FFCAE8D9A9C6E2FBE0D60FAC97DEECF94D0E7EF2F4C43573248879930