Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-24 13:27:05 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B5D17868D1E79382D4D3B965137651EBD783601F89DD2F6504C4ADF1F45DC8A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge’s exact wording was that he “may have” invoked the act. Using the word “probably” when summarizing his ruling wildly misrepresents his actual view. Also, tweets are not reliable sources

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749973868561764529
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B5D17868D1E79382D4D3B965137651EBD783601F89DD2F6504C4ADF1F45DC8A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1706102825823
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1749973868561764529B5D17868D1E79382D4D3B965137651EBD783601F89DD2F6504C4ADF1F45DC8A0