Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-26 13:49:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CA8823BDAF6FDEEF1504CE19799DF67F1EEBE9F0C6FE85C2AD34137C8A6AA65C
Participant Details

Original Note:

No Note Needed. The Supreme Court decision in this case was based on Article VI, Clause 2, of the U.S. Constitution. OP is simply expressing his personal opinion that he disagrees with the U.S. Constitution. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artVI-C2-1/ALDE_00013395/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749846589370163477
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CA8823BDAF6FDEEF1504CE19799DF67F1EEBE9F0C6FE85C2AD34137C8A6AA65C
  • createdAtMillis - 1706276998020
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1749846589370163477CA8823BDAF6FDEEF1504CE19799DF67F1EEBE9F0C6FE85C2AD34137C8A6AA65C