Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-23 19:12:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 32F5A29D0AB69211B9C7C62C4F56638CB6835C6229A52E49F96E1A57401BBE44
Participant Details

Original Note:

No Note Needed. The Supreme Court decision in this case was based on Article VI, Clause 2, of the U.S. Constitution. OP is simply expressing his personal opinion that he disagrees with the U.S. Constitution. https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artVI-C2-1/ALDE_00013395/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749846589370163477
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 32F5A29D0AB69211B9C7C62C4F56638CB6835C6229A52E49F96E1A57401BBE44
  • createdAtMillis - 1706037150227
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174984658937016347732F5A29D0AB69211B9C7C62C4F56638CB6835C6229A52E49F96E1A57401BBE44