Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-23 14:45:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BAB300DE2A4FB0A9C1D7D9EE8E2856A0CFF5F1ECEFF4E26873D007560D98529F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Los audios no demuestran corrupción alguna. Demuestran que el árbitro de VAR descartó agresión de Vinicius por lo que el VAR no podía entrar el la jugada. No hay evidencia alguna de corrupción. Se trata de una diferencia de apreciación. https://t.co/l1eymzPZAx

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749736230831452183
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BAB300DE2A4FB0A9C1D7D9EE8E2856A0CFF5F1ECEFF4E26873D007560D98529F
  • createdAtMillis - 1706021151893
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1749736230831452183BAB300DE2A4FB0A9C1D7D9EE8E2856A0CFF5F1ECEFF4E26873D007560D98529F