Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-23 09:14:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BCF73D6F044A58DCF138C5651D0595F99B66F2D85AFCE05629FCC7AB007FBAAD
Participant Details

Original Note:

The previous note links to a metanalysis by Bustos et al supporting a 1% regret figure. This metaanlysis has been criticised in the same journal for methodologcal innacuracies and high risk of bias https://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/2021/11000/letter_to_the_editor__regret_after.29.aspx

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749707998312968454
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BCF73D6F044A58DCF138C5651D0595F99B66F2D85AFCE05629FCC7AB007FBAAD
  • createdAtMillis - 1706001296897
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1749707998312968454BCF73D6F044A58DCF138C5651D0595F99B66F2D85AFCE05629FCC7AB007FBAAD