Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-24 07:30:57 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D3BB20C2BECEC82D12D002BAFF2E8E1201A5F62FE548DBA75114013CD121FA39
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The note writers can't disprove the fraudolent nature of mail voting that the lawsuit exposes so they resort to calling people conspiracy theorists.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749693847305634261
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D3BB20C2BECEC82D12D002BAFF2E8E1201A5F62FE548DBA75114013CD121FA39
  • createdAtMillis - 1706081457481
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1749693847305634261D3BB20C2BECEC82D12D002BAFF2E8E1201A5F62FE548DBA75114013CD121FA39